Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2

Comparison 9. Comparison: misoprostol versus PGF.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Induction to abortion interval 1   Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
1.1 Vaginal misoprostol versus PGF 1 118 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐4.60 [‐7.74, ‐1.46]
2 Abortion within 24 hours 1 122 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.53, 2.60]
2.1 Vaginal misoprostol versus PGF 1 122 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.18 [0.53, 2.60]
3 Surgical evacuation 1 122 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.32, 2.02]
3.1 Vaginal misoprostol versus PGF 1 122 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.80 [0.32, 2.02]
4 Nausea 1 118 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.26, 1.47]
4.1 Vaginal misoprostol versus PGF 1 118 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.62 [0.26, 1.47]
5 Vomiting 1 118 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.25, 1.59]
5.1 Vaginal misoprostol versus PGF 1 118 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.63 [0.25, 1.59]
6 Diarrhoea 1   Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Subtotals only
6.1 Vaginal misoprostol versus PGF 1 118 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.49 [0.21, 1.14]