Faktor 1988.
Methods | Randomisation. Authors report that there was 'no selection bias in the choice of the patients'. | |
Participants | 77 pregnant women (group Ia: 35, group Ib: 17, group II: 16, group III: 9) Inclusion criteria: mid‐trimester abortion (15‐26 weeks gestation). Exclusion criteria: none given. |
|
Interventions | Group Ia: 1.0g oxytetracycline hydrochloride, dissolved in 16‐20 ml of normal physiological saline, intra‐amniotic. Patients received oxytocin i.v. in increasing dosage after the appearance of uterine contractions un till time of abortion. Group Ib: 1.0g oxytetracycline hydrochloride, dissolved in 16‐20 ml of normal physiological saline, intra‐amniotic. No oxytocin was given. Group II: 200 cm3 amniotic fluid was exchanged for 200 cm3 of 20% of hypertonic saline. Group III: 40 mg of PGF2α, intra‐amniotic. Group I is considered as the intervention group and group II and III are considered control groups. |
|
Outcomes | Abortion interval, side‐effects. | |
Notes | Definition of abortion: expulsion of the fetus. After expulsion of the fetus, all patients underwent revision of the uterine cavity under general anaesthesia. No major complications described. For our analysis, we did not include oxytetracycline hydrochloride. |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Allocation concealment? | Low risk | B ‐ unclear |
Blinding? All outcomes | High risk | |
Free of other bias? | Unclear risk | No baseline characteristics of the separate groups were provided. |