Skip to main content
. 2011 Jan 19;2011(1):CD005216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005216.pub2

Faktor 1988.

Methods Randomisation. Authors report that there was 'no selection bias in the choice of the patients'.
Participants 77 pregnant women (group Ia: 35, group Ib: 17, group II: 16, group III: 9)
Inclusion criteria: mid‐trimester abortion (15‐26 weeks gestation).
Exclusion criteria: none given.
Interventions Group Ia: 1.0g oxytetracycline hydrochloride, dissolved in 16‐20 ml of normal physiological saline, intra‐amniotic. Patients received oxytocin i.v. in increasing dosage after the appearance of uterine contractions un till time of abortion.
Group Ib: 1.0g oxytetracycline hydrochloride, dissolved in 16‐20 ml of normal physiological saline, intra‐amniotic. No oxytocin was given.
Group II: 200 cm3 amniotic fluid was exchanged for 200 cm3 of 20% of hypertonic saline.
Group III: 40 mg of PGF, intra‐amniotic.
Group I is considered as the intervention group and group II and III are considered control groups.
Outcomes Abortion interval, side‐effects.
Notes Definition of abortion: expulsion of the fetus.
After expulsion of the fetus, all patients underwent revision of the uterine cavity under general anaesthesia.
No major complications described.
For our analysis, we did not include oxytetracycline hydrochloride.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk B ‐ unclear
Blinding? 
 All outcomes High risk  
Free of other bias? Unclear risk No baseline characteristics of the separate groups were provided.