Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 30;21:1184. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07201-w

Table 3.

Result of fixed effect model

log (medical revenue) log (outpatient visit) log (total occupy beds of inpatient) log (surgery revenue) log (sickbed utilization rate)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
Subsidy percentage − 0.024*** − 0.013*** − 0.026*** − 0.014*** − 0.018***
(< 0.001) (< 0.001) (0.001) (0.003) (0.001)
Type of THCs [C220] −0.022 − 0.002 0.074 0.071 − 0.038
(0.036) (0.038) (0.109) (0.226) (0.068)
Number of Physician 0.005*** 0.005*** 0.005** 0.011** 0.002
(0.001) (0.001) (0.002) (0.005) (0.002)
Number of authorized bed 0.006*** 0.005*** 0.034*** 0.018*** −0.000
(0.001) (0.001) (0.003) (0.006) (0.002)
Separation revenue policy −0.054*** −0.085*** − 0.228*** −0.290** − 0.108***
(0.020) (0.022) (0.061) (0.128) (0.039)
Individual effect YES YES YES YES YES
Time effect YES YES YES YES YES
Observations 10,791 10,791 10,791 10,791 10,791
R2 0.264 0.097 0.063 0.006 0.052
Adjusted R2 0.171 −0.018 −0.055 −0.120 −0.068
F Statistic (df = 5; 9579) 688.720*** 204.784*** 129.574*** 10.739*** 105.410***

Note: ***p < 0.01; **p < 0.05;* p < 0.1

p value of Hausman Test is < 0.05, which indicates that fixed effect model is better