Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 22;99(10):skab269. doi: 10.1093/jas/skab269

Table 5.

Effect of bismuth subsalicylate and calcium ammonium nitrate on continuous carcass characteristics

Item1 Treatment2 SEM3 P-value4
U NIT UBS NITBS LOW-S SUL NPNS BSS BSS × NPNS
Hot carcass weight, kg 412.8 402.9 411.1 402.9 410.5 7.27 0.694 0.033 0.841 0.832
Dressing, % 62.3 62.6 63.0 62.4 62.7 0.32 0.366 0.575 0.379 0.097
LM area, cm2 88.97 86.11 83.88 85.42 86.18 1.949 0.226 0.685 0.080 0.179
Fat thickness, cm 1.71 1.67 1.78 1.66 1.96 0.076 0.029 0.282 0.712 0.637
Marbling score 579.1 578.8 583.5 566.1 589.8 17.54 0.676 0.622 0.816 0.636
Calculated yield grade 3.24 3.28 3.68 3.17 3.58 0.121 0.036 0.044 0.143 0.019

1LM, Longissimus muscle area (cm2). Marbling score, 400 =Small00; 500, Modest00; 600, Moderate00.

2U, Control (Urea at 0.68% with 0.28% RAS); NIT, Nitrate (eCAN at 2.0% with 0.28% RAS); UBS, Urea-Bismuth (Urea at 0.68% and BSS at 0.33% with 0.28% RAS); NITBS, Nitrate-Bismuth (eCAN at 2.0% and BSS at 0.33% with 0.28% RAS); LOW-S, Low sulfur (Urea at 0.68% with 0.14% RAS).

3n = 10 experimental units/treatment mean.

4Significance is declared at P< 0.05, tendencies are discussed at 0.05 < P < 0.10. SUL, Effect of sulfur; NPNS, Effect of non-protein nitrogen source; BSS, Effect of BSS; BSS × NPNS, Interaction between NPNS and BSS.