TABLE 2.
Comparative results of four screening methodologies for identification of C. glabrata
| Test method, no. of hours | No. of results
|
% Sensitivity | % Specificity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| False negative | False positive | |||
| Mayo assimilation, 1 | 10 | 7 | 96.6 | 74.1 |
| Remel assimilation, 3 | 25 | 1 | 91.5 | 96.3 |
| Remel fermentation, 24 | 14 | 3 | 95.0 | 89.0 |
| Hardy fermentation, 24 | 12 | 0 | 96.0 | 100 |