Skip to main content
. 1999 Oct;37(10):3387–3389. doi: 10.1128/jcm.37.10.3387-3389.1999

TABLE 2.

Comparative results of four screening methodologies for identification of C. glabrata

Test method, no. of hours No. of results
% Sensitivity % Specificity
False negative False positive
Mayo assimilation, 1 10 7 96.6 74.1
Remel assimilation, 3 25 1 91.5 96.3
Remel fermentation, 24 14 3 95.0 89.0
Hardy fermentation, 24 12 0 96.0 100