Table 5.
Regression terms for the relationship between piglet birth weight1 and weaning weight within Litter Size treatment
| Item1,2 | Coefficient3 | Adjustment4 | SE | P-value5 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept, kg | ||||
| Decreased | 6.33 | – | 0.135 | <0.0001 |
| Adjustment for Control | – | −0.35 | 0.134 | 0.01 |
| Adjustment for Increased | – | −0.38 | 0.133 | 0.004 |
| Linear term, kg weaning weight per kg birth weight | ||||
| Decreased | 2.88 | − | 0.284 | <0.0001 |
| Adjustment for Control | – | −0.36 | 0.389 | 0.36 |
| Adjustment for Increased | – | −0.45 | 0.385 | 0.24 |
| Quadratic term, kg weaning weight per kg birth weight squared | ||||
| Decreased | −1.16 | – | 0.356 | 0.001 |
| Adjustment for Control | – | −0.07 | 0.910 | 0.94 |
| Adjustment for Increased | – | −0.11 | 0.902 | 0.90 |
| Model R2 | 0.39 | – | – | – |
1Using centered birth weight, with a mean of 1.46 kg. The regression model included Litter Size treatment, linear and quadratic birth weight, the interactions of birth weight with Litter Size treatment, and the random effect of block.
2Decreased = 2 piglets less than the sow functional teat number; Control = the same number of piglets as the sow functional teat number; Increased = 2 piglets more than the sow functional teat number.
3Intercept and slope for the Decreased treatment.
4Adjustment to intercept or slope for the Control or Increased treatments.
5For the Decreased treatment, P-values indicate whether the intercept or slope are different to 0. P-values for the Control and Increased treatments indicate differences for intercept or slope compared to the Decreased treatment.