Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;12:727761. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727761

Table 5.

Statistical tests for research question 2: two-step versus one-step word problems.

Fixed effects LL #p LR χ2 df p
Hypothesis 2a
M0 - −3465.9 3
M1 Grade −3309.0 6 M1-M0 313.778 3 <0.001
M2 Grade+Steps −3307.5 7 M2-M1 3.044 1 0.081
M3 Grade*Steps −3305.5 10 M3-M2 4.014 3 0.26
Hypothesis 2b: reading comprehension process (MOCCA)
M4a Grade+Steps −3295.1 7
M5a Grade+Steps+MOCCA −3261.6 8 M5a-M4a 63.328 1 <0.001
M6a Grade+Steps*MOCCA −3255.8 9 M6a-M5a 6.480 1 0.011
M7a Grade*Steps*MOCCA −3254.8 15 M7a-M6a 0.892 6 0.99
Hypothesis 2b: reading comprehension product (CITO)
M4b Grade+Steps −2746.9 7
M5b Grade+Steps+CITO −2715.2 8 M5b-M4b 88.702 1 <0.001
M6b Grade+Steps*CITO −2712.0 9 M6b-M5b 0.156 1 0.69
M7b Grade*Steps*CITO −2711.5 15 M7b-M6b 6.686 6 0.35
Hypothesis 2b: non-verbal reasoning (RAVEN)
M4c Grade+Steps −3307.5 7
M5c Grade+Steps+RAVEN −3263.1 8 M5c-M4c 58.582 1 <0.001
M6c Grade+Steps*RAVEN −3263.0 9 M6c-M5c 1.856 1 0.17
M7c Grade*Steps*RAVEN −3259.7 15 M7c-M6c 2.810 6 0.83
Hypothesis 2b: working memory (WM)
M4d Grade+Steps −3227.5 7
M5d Grade+Steps+WM −3198.2 8 M5d-M4d 66.958 1 <0.001
M6d Grade+Steps*WM −3197.3 9 M6d-M5d 11.604 1 0.001
M7d Grade*Steps*WM −3195.9 15 M7d-M6d 2.032 6 0.92

LL, log-likelihood; #p, number of parameters; LR, likelihood ratio test; χ2, test statistic LR-test; Steps, number of arithmetic steps (one or two).