Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;9:723507. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2021.723507

TABLE 3.

Superionic transition temperatures T S for the different potentials, compared to experimental references. Superionic transition temperatures were calculated from C P(T) curves, except for those marked.

Compound Potential T S/K T m/K T M/K
This work Ref Ref This work
BaF2 Catlow and Norgett (1973) 1,550 1,135 b (1) 1,350 b (1) 2,290
Cazorla et al. (2018) 1,200 a 1,275(2) 1,628(2) 1,630
Sayle et al. (2003) 1,200 a 1,300(3) 1,555(3) 1,600
CaF2 Bingham et al. (1989) 1,300 a - 1,660 b (1) 1,910
Catlow and Norgett (1973) 1,650 1,400 b (1) 2,670
Evangelakis and Pontikis (1989) 1,400 1,430(5) 1,696(2) 2,430
Sayle et al. (2003) 1,300 a 1,633(4) 1980
Li2O Asahi et al. (2014) 1,275 1,350(6) 1,703(7) 1,910
Oda et al. (2007) 1,300 1,950
Pedone et al. (2006) 1,050 1,650
β-PbF2 Catlow et al. (1978) 1,400 a 711(8) 1,128(2) 1,950
SrCl2 Bendall and Catlow (1980) 1,200 a 1,001(5) 1,148(2) 1,510
Gillan and Dixon (1980) 920 a 1,146(4) 1,290
SrF2 Bingham et al. (1989) 1,200 a 1,150 b (1) 1,430 b (1) 1,810
Catlow and Norgett (1973) 1,630 1,370(3) 1,746(2) 2,530
Cazorla et al. (2018) 1,500 a 1,400(2) 1,723(4) 2,080
UO2 Cooper et al. (2014b) 2,550 2,670(9) 3,126(10) 3,440
Morelon et al. (2003) 2,600 a 4,100
a

which were estimated from D(T) curves. The reference values are from experiments, except for those marked.

b

which come from DFT calculations. The T M temperatures are the mechanical melting points from our simulations. Whilst they are not directly comparable, we also provide experimental melting points T m for context. Experimental references are: (1) Cazorla et al. (2018); (2) Lidiard (1980); (3) Thomas (1976); (4) Catlow et al. (1978); (5) Dworkin and Bredig (1968); (6) Hull et al. (1988); (7) Kurasawa (1982); (8) Dickens et al. (1982); (9) Hiernaut et al. (1993); (10) Böhler et al. (2014).