Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 18;12:688285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.688285

Table 4.

Univariable Cox regression investigating intentional self-harm (ICD 10 codes X60–X84).

Risk factor (ICD 10 code) Intentional self-harm (X60–X84) Single factor cox regression Bonferroni-Holm significance level
n (%) HR 95% CI p
Social welfare payment 56 (14.5) 1.443 0.977–2.132 0.066 NA
No social welfare payment 46 (10.0)
Female gender 31 (18.3) 1.807 1.185–7.755 0.006 0.01
Male gender 71 (10.5)
Age 1.000 0.984–1.016 0.996 NA
AUD (F10)* 46 (19.7) 2.214 1.499–3.270 <0.001 0.005
No AUD 56 (9.1)
SUD (F11–F19) * 52 (26.7) 3.648 2.473–5.382 <0.001 0.006
No SUD 50 (7.7)
Psychotic disorder (F20–F29) 12 (17.6) 1.461 0.799–2.670 0.218 NA
No psychotic disorder 90 (11.5)
Anxiety disorder (F40–48)* 81 (17.4) 3.262 2.019–5.272 <0.001 0.006
no anxiety disorder 21 (5.5)
Depressive disorder (F32–33)* 72 (19.5) 3.229 2.109–4.943 <0.001 0.007
No depressive disorder 30 (6.3)
Personality disorder (F60–62)* 37 (26.6) 3.055 2.039–4.577 <0.001 0.008
No personality disorder 65 (9.2)
Bipolar disorder (F30–31) 17 (16.3) 1.435 0.852–2.415 0.174 NA
No bipolar disorder 85 (11.4)
Criminal conviction 38 (16.9) 1.581 1.058–2.363 0.025 NA
No criminal conviction 64 (10.3)

Censoring (time of death, final emigration, or end of study: 20171231). Significant results at p level 0.05 were then tested with the Bonferroni-Holm procedure (n = 11). N = 848.

*

Significant result at the alfa level 0.05 after Bonferroni-Holm procedure. AUD, alcohol use diagnosis; SUD, substance use diagnosis.

NA, not applicable.