Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 7;2(10):813–824. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.210.BJO-2021-0069.R1

Table IV.

The CT-based measurements and outcome parameters of the five study groups and of the control group. Level of significance was adjusted using the Bonferroni correction for six groups (0.05/6 = 0.008).

Parameter Cam FAI Acetabular retroversion Hip dysplasia Total acetabular retroversion High acetabular anteversion Control group p-value*
Hips, n (patients) 32 (24) 41 (33) 47 (29) 15 (9) 20 (17) 48 (27)
Mean pelvic incidence, ° (SD; range) 51 (7; 34 to 66) 42 (10; 24 to 67) 55 (12; 25 to 75) 37 (7; 24 to 46) 57 (11; 38 to 75) 51 (9; 32 to 72) < 0.001
Mean pelvic tilt, ° (SD; range) 8 (5; -1 to 19) 4 (5; -6 to 12) 10 (6; -2 to 27) 4 (5; -6 to 10) 11 (7; 2 to 27) 13 (7; 4 to 27) < 0.001
Mean sacral slope, ° (SD; range) 42 (7; 28 to 64) 38 (9 ;16 to 58) 44 (9; 19 to 60) 34 (9; 16 to 43) 46 (8; 27 to 60) 38 (7; 26 to 54) < 0.001
Mean external iliac rotation, inferior iliac wing angle, ° (SD; range) 24 (5; 14 to 32) 29 (4; 16 to 33) 20 (5; 6 to 29) 31 (2; 26 to 33) 19 (5; 6 to 28) 25 (5; 15 to 33) < 0.001
Mean pelvic inclination, ° (SD; range) 66 (5; 57 to 78) 69 (5; 61 to 83) 65 (7; 48 to 83) 68 (5; 62 to 78) 64 (7; 48 to 75) 59 (7; 46 to 70) 0.038
Mean acetabular version, ° (SD; range) 18 (6; 8 to 30) 10 (6; -2 to 25) 22 (5; 9 to 36) 5 (4; -2 to 14) 25 (5; 15 to 36) 18 (5; 8 to 26) < 0.001
Mean APP angle, ° (SD; range) 5 (5; -7 to 17) 8 (5; -1 to 24) 7 (6; -6 to 20) 8 (6; -1 to 15) 7 (7; -4 to 20) 1 (7; -10 to 15) 0.703
*

Analysis of variance.

Significant difference compared to hips with acetabular retroversion.

Significant difference compared to hips with total acetabular retroversion.

APP, anterior pelvic plane; FAI, femoroacetabular impingement; SD, standard deviation.