Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 5;112(6):508–518. doi: 10.1093/jhered/esab043

Table 4.

Components of reproductive skew among populations of Thamnophis elegans for males and females

Ecotype Population Number of breeders Reproductive successa % multiply-sired littersa I-Va Skew within litter Observed sires per litter Operational sex ratio
L-fast
Dams 30
L2 13 11.84 38% 0.91 1.46 0.62
L3 4 6.50 50% 1.49 1.50 0.86
L4 13 11.00 62% 0.45 1.77 0.25
Dam Avg. 10.77 50% 0.98 1.60 0.55
Sires 39 0.12***
L2 16 8.69 4.20 0.07*
L3 5 4.20 2.55 0.06
L4 18 6.78 2.72 0.17**
Sires Avg. 7.23 3.59
M-slow
Dams 26
M1 8 6.50 25% 1.10 1.25 0.40
M2 9 3.67 44% 0.27 1.67 0.68
M3 9 6.11 44% 0.22 1.44 0.97
Dam Avg. 5.38 38% 0.82 1.46 0.71
Sires 29 0.07**
M1 8 6.00 0.81 0.10
M2 10 3.00 0.89 0.04
M3 11 4.64 0.96 0.08*
Sires Avg. 4.45 1.15

Number of breeders in the study for each population; least-squares means of average male and female reproductive success (see text for details); percent of litters with multiple paternity; Index of Variability (I-V) among breeding individuals of the same sex in a population; skew among sires within a litter; average number of observed number of sires; operational sex ratio (values less than 1.0 are female biased). Asterisk denote significant estimates/comparisons (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).

aNote that ecotype averages are indices calculated with values for all individuals, not arithmetic means of population values.