Table 4.
Components of reproductive skew among populations of Thamnophis elegans for males and females
| Ecotype | Population | Number of breeders | Reproductive successa | % multiply-sired littersa | I-Va | Skew within litter | Observed sires per litter | Operational sex ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L-fast | ||||||||
| Dams | 30 | |||||||
| L2 | 13 | 11.84 | 38% | 0.91 | 1.46 | 0.62 | ||
| L3 | 4 | 6.50 | 50% | 1.49 | 1.50 | 0.86 | ||
| L4 | 13 | 11.00 | 62% | 0.45 | 1.77 | 0.25 | ||
| Dam Avg. | 10.77 | 50% | 0.98 | 1.60 | 0.55 | |||
| Sires | 39 | 0.12*** | ||||||
| L2 | 16 | 8.69 | 4.20 | 0.07* | ||||
| L3 | 5 | 4.20 | 2.55 | 0.06 | ||||
| L4 | 18 | 6.78 | 2.72 | 0.17** | ||||
| Sires Avg. | 7.23 | 3.59 | ||||||
| M-slow | ||||||||
| Dams | 26 | |||||||
| M1 | 8 | 6.50 | 25% | 1.10 | 1.25 | 0.40 | ||
| M2 | 9 | 3.67 | 44% | 0.27 | 1.67 | 0.68 | ||
| M3 | 9 | 6.11 | 44% | 0.22 | 1.44 | 0.97 | ||
| Dam Avg. | 5.38 | 38% | 0.82 | 1.46 | 0.71 | |||
| Sires | 29 | 0.07** | ||||||
| M1 | 8 | 6.00 | 0.81 | 0.10 | ||||
| M2 | 10 | 3.00 | 0.89 | 0.04 | ||||
| M3 | 11 | 4.64 | 0.96 | 0.08* | ||||
| Sires Avg. | 4.45 | 1.15 |
Number of breeders in the study for each population; least-squares means of average male and female reproductive success (see text for details); percent of litters with multiple paternity; Index of Variability (I-V) among breeding individuals of the same sex in a population; skew among sires within a litter; average number of observed number of sires; operational sex ratio (values less than 1.0 are female biased). Asterisk denote significant estimates/comparisons (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).
aNote that ecotype averages are indices calculated with values for all individuals, not arithmetic means of population values.