Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 27;49(12):e67. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab199

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Effect of experimental factors on model identifiability to separately estimate Inline graphic and Inline graphic. Identifiability was evaluated using metric Inline graphic, based on the simulated effects of (A) choice of BYO samples (with relative error = 0.2) and (B) relative error (using the BYO series of the extended substrate range). Reacted fractions for 10 201 (1012) simulated sequences with true Inline graphic, Inline graphic in the parameter space shown in the figure were fit to the pseudo-first order model, and Inline graphic values for each sequence were calculated from 100 bootstrapped samples. Higher values of Inline graphic indicate that Inline graphic and Inline graphic are less separable. (A) Choosing a wider range of BYO concentration is more effective in improving the region of identifiable data compared to adding more replicates of the same BYO concentrations. (B) With higher measurement error, Inline graphic and Inline graphic become increasingly difficult to estimate separately.