Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Biomol Screen. 2016 Dec;21(10):1090–1099. doi: 10.1177/1087057116675315

Table 2.

Cell cycle analysis of KLE cells treated with probe prodrugs DB289 and DB844.

Treatment Sub-G1 G0/G1 S G2/M >4N
Prodrug α-NFb
Untreated 5.2 ± 1.0a 36.8 ± 3.5 13.6 ± 0.1 44.7 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.7
DB289 10 μM 5.1 ± 1.4 40.0 ± 1.7 5.3 ± 1.1*** 45.0 ± 5.2 1.7 ± 0.6
100 μM 4.5 ± 0.7 43.2 ± 0.8* 8.3 ± 1.0*** 39.5 ± 0.2 4.5 ± 1.3
DB844 10 μM 4.6 ± 0.8 38.7 ± 2.1 8.0 ± 1.4*** 47.3 ± 0.5 6.3 ± 1.9
100 μM 5.3 ± 1.5 43.9 ± 1.2** 6.6 ± 1.1*** 40.6 ± 1.3 3.7 ± 0.9
Untreated + 5.2 ± 1.6 42.0 ± 4.0 9.0 ± 2.5 38.8 ± 5.8 3.9 ± 1.7
DB289 10 μM + 5.4 ± 0.0 39.5 ± 0.6 9.8 ± 1.4 39.3 ± 2.9 5.3 ± 1.0
100 μM + 4.7 ± 1.0 43.2 ± 3.4 6.1 ± 1.1 42.4 ± 2.6 3.6 ± 0.4
DB844 10 μM + 4.1 ± 1.1 41.1 ± 1.5 7.9 ± 1.5 40.7 ± 2.9 4.9 ± 0.9
100 μM + 4.3 ± 0.9 43.3 ± 0.4 5.6 ± 0.7 41.8 ± 1.1 3.4 ± 0.6
a

Values denote % of cells in each phase of cell cycle and represent means ± standard deviations of triplicate determinations.

b

α-NF concentration was 10 μM.

*

P < 0.05,

**

P < 0.01,

***

P < 0.001,

compared to untreated cells of the corresponding α-NF treatment group (one-way ANOVA with Dunnett post test).