Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 1;10(Suppl 2):S62–S74. doi: 10.1002/sctm.20-0495

TABLE 2.

Comparison of transplant effects between single‐unit and double‐unit UCBT

Ref. Transplant type Patient no., conditioning Neutrophil engraftment rate Median neutrophil engraftment time Grade III to IV acute GVHD Chronic GVHD Relapse rate TRM OS LFS
Kindwall‐Keller et al 57 sUCBT 27, RIC 85% 25 19.2% 21.7% 59.3% 11.1% 35.9% 28.6%
dUCBT 23, RIC 91% 23 17.4% 26.3% 30.4% 17.4% 39.1% 39.1%
P value / .99 .99 .87 .73 .045 .48 .86 .71
Wagner et al 58 sUCBT 113, MAC 89% 21 13% 9% a 12% 19% 73% 70%
dUCBT 111, MAC 88% 23 23% 15% a 14% 22% 65% 64%
P value / .29 >.05 .02 .05 a .12 .43 .17 .11
Michel et al 59 sUCBT 68, MAC 92.6% 24.8 25.0% 14.7% a 23.5% 5.9% 68.8% 67.6%
dUCBT 69, MAC 94.2% 23.5 18.8% 31.9% a 17.4% 11.6% 74.8% 68.1%
P value / >.05 >.05 .40 .02 a .31 .25 .56 .74
Baron et al 60 sUCBT 172, RIC 77% 19 11% 28% 32% 22% 41% 46%
dUCBT 362, RIC 83% 24 13% 36% 35% 29% 51% 36%
P value / .40 <.001 .6 .2 .5 .2 .03 .06
Balligand et al 61 sUCBT 56, MAC (MRD+) N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. 41.7% 19% 53.6% 53%
dUCBT 59, MAC (MRD+) N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. 10.5% 22% 82.6% 82.6%
P value / N.R. N.R. N.R. N.R. .025 .43 .031 .028
Zheng et al 62 sUCBT 60, MAC 96.7% 19 12.1% 24.4% 11.7% 33.3% 56.7% 55.0%
dUCBT 37, MAC 89.2% 22 8.7% 28.4% 13.5% 54.1% 37.8% 32.4%
P value / .026 .079 .59 .72 .82 .026 .037 .017
a

Extensive chronic GVHD.

Abbreviations: dUCBT, double‐unit UCBT; GVHD, graft‐vs‐host disease; LFS, leukemia free survival; MAC, myeloablative conditioning; MRD, minimal residual disease; N.R., not reported; OS, overall survival; RIC, reduced intensified conditioning; sUCBT, single‐unit UCBT; TRM, transplant‐related mortality; UCBT, umbilical cord blood transplantation.