Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 25;2021:7849623. doi: 10.1155/2021/7849623

Table 2.

The summary of the GRADE evaluation.

Outcome MD/SMD/RR (95% CI) Quality of evidence Reasons
Intraoperative opioid consumption −9.85 (−19.52, −0.18) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”;;inconsistency was “serious”
Postoperative opioid consumption −38.51 (−60.97, −16.05) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”;inconsistency was “serious”
Pain score at 1 H postoperatively −1.23 (−2.00, −0.45) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”; inconsistency was “serious”
Pain score at 2 H postoperatively −0.71 (−1.00, −0.41) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”; inconsistency was “serious”
Pain score at 4 H postoperatively −1.52 (−2.77, −0.27) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”; inconsistency was “serious”
Pain score at 6 H postoperatively −0.80 (−1.51, −0.08) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”; inconsistency was “serious”
Pain score at 8 H postoperatively −1.12 (−1.98, −0.27) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”; inconsistency was “serious”
Pain score at 12 H postoperatively −0.78 (−1.21, −0.35) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”; inconsistency was “serious”
Pain score at 24 H postoperatively −0.71 (−1.20, −0.23) ⨁⨁◯◯ LOW Indirectness was “serious”; inconsistency was “serious”
Incidence of PONV 0.32 (0.19, 0.55) ⨁⨁⨁◯ MODERATE Inconsistency was “serious”

SMD, standardised mean difference; RR, risk ratio; H, hour; PONV, postoperative nausea and vomiting.