Skip to main content
. 2021 May 16;49(6):575–583. doi: 10.1007/s00240-021-01271-5

Table 1.

Patient demographics

Demographics
Case number, n 15
Gender (male), n (%) 12 (80%)
Median age, years (range) 8.5 (4–15)
Median weight, kgs (range) 32.2 (14–55)
Associated anomalies
 Uretero–pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), n (%) 11 (73%)
 Neurogenic bladder, n (%) 2 (13.3%)
 Other, n (%) 0
Presentation symptoms
 Colicky flank pain, n (%) 6 (40%)
 Colicky flank pain, hematuria, n (%) 2 (13.3%)
 Urinary tract infections (UTIs), n (%) 5 (33.3%)
 Asymptomatic, incidental finding, n (%) 2 (13.3%)
Stone location
 Renal pelvis, n (%) 8 (53.3%)
 Lower pole, n (%) 3 (20%)
 Renal pelvis and lower pole, n (%) 2 (13.3%)
 Bladder, n (%) 2 (13.3%)
Affected kidney data (n = 13)
 Side
  Left, n (%) 4 (30.8%)
  Right, n (%) 8 (61.5%)
  Bilateral, n (%) 1 (7.7%)
  Total renal units, n 15
 Location
  Orthotopic, n (%) 13 (100%)
  Pelvic, horseshoe, n (%) 0
Stone pre-operative data
 Median stone size, mm (range) 20.8 (3–30)
 Median number of stones, n (range) 3 (1–15)
 Multiple stones present, n (%) 5 (35.7%)
Indications for RALS
 Concomitant pyeloplasty, n (%) 11 (73.3%)
 Large stone size, n (%) 7 (46.6%)
 Previous failed endourological procedure, n (%) 1 (6.6%)

RALS robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery