Table 1.
Pre-clinical evidence | Clinical evidence | |
---|---|---|
IL-4 | ◊ IL-4 blocking in IL-10 deficient mice: protected from colitis development (63) ◊ No IL-4Rα: no disease development (73) |
◊ UC patients: ↑ IL-4 expression levels in inflamed mucosa (62) ◊ CD patients: ↓ IL-4 levels in intestinal tissue due to lower numbers of IL-4 producing cells in mucosal biopsies (74) |
◊ IL-4/IL-13 dual antagonist in oxazolone colitis model (67, 68) - Reduced overall disease activity ◊ IL-4/IL-13 blocking trough a shared receptor (69, 71) - Reduced overall disease severity |
||
IL-13 | ◊ CD and UC patients: ↑ IL-13Rα2 in mucosal biopsies (94, 95) ◊ Potential biomarker for anti-TNF non-responsiveness (96) ◊ Clinical trial with Tralokinumab and Anrukinzumab: no therapeutic effects (62) |
|
◊ {IL-13Rα2 KO model
DSS model: mice protected ssssss from colitis introduction (92) ◊ IL-13Rα2 KO model: not protected from colitis development but recovered faster (91) |
||
IL-5 | ◊ {Mepolizumab & Reslizumab Benralizumab Attenuates type 2 response + used and shown effective in eosnophl eosinophilic asthma patients ◊ UC patients’ rectal perfusion fluids (84): - ↑ IL-5 levels |
|
IL-33 | ◊ SAMP/YitFc colitis model and antibody mediated ST2 blocking (102): - ↓ Th2 cytokine production and ↓ eosinophil recruitment into the ileum ◊ C57BL/6 ST2 KO mice (104) and ST2 antibody mediated depletion in C57BL/6 mice alleviated disease symptoms |
◊ UC patients: ↑ colonic IL-33 mRNA levels and activated eosinophils (100) ◊ IBD patients’ intestinal biopsies (101–103): - ST2/IL-33 signaling - Eosinophil infiltration which coincided with Th2 mediated immune response - IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13 release |
TGF-β1 | ◊ TGF-β1 deficient mice: spontaneously develop colitis (113, 114) | ◊ Active inflammation in IBD patients: ↑ }TGF-β1 protein levels ↓ (111, 112) = |
EDN | ◊ UC patients: ↑ f(EDN) protein levels during and 3 months prior to relapse: possible prognostic role (131) ◊ Suggested as a prognostic marker in paediatric patients (132) |
|
ECP | ◊ Active CD and UC: ↑ serum ECP compared to HC (118) | |
◊ Eosinophil gastroenteritis: ECP and MBP deposition in small bowel (119) | ||
MBP | ◊ MBP KO mice: no colitis development upon oxazolone exposure (135) ◊ In vitro co-culture of eosinophils and epithelial cells decreased functioning of the epithelial barrier - attributed to MBP (135) |
|
◊ MBP directly increases epithelial layer permeability via its toxicity (134) | ||
EPX | ◊ DSS colitis model: ↑ EPX release in colonic lumen (130) ◊ EPX-/- mice: colitis amelioration (130) |
◊ CD patients’ colonic mucosal biopsies and UC patients’ colonic perfusion fluids - ↑ EPX levels during active disease (123–125) ◊ IBD patients: EPX ↑ at diagnosis but decreased again during disease course (126) |