Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 1;181(12):1–8. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6227

Table 3. Self-controlled Case Series Results From Analysis of GBS Risk Following RZV Administration.

Analysis Risk case Control cases Risk days Control days Rate ratio (95% CI) Attributable riska
Per million doses Per 100 000 person-years
Unadjusted (95% CI)b PPV-Adjusted (95% CI)c Unadjusted (95% CI)b PPV-Adjusted (95% CI)c
Original study period (October 1, 2017 to March 31, 2019)
Primary analysis
Claims-based (all doses) 13 8 1092 2928 4.30 (1.76-10.53) 6.47 (2.50-10.45) 5.08 (1.04-9.11) 1.98 (0.77-3.20) 1.56 (0.32-2.79)
Secondary analysis
Claims-based (first dose only) 13 4 714 2090 9.30 (3.00-28.84)d 12.20 (7.41-17.00)d 9.50 (4.35-14.66)d 4.10 (2.49-5.72)d 3.20 (1.46-4.93)d
Medical record–confirmed analysis
All doses (risk: 1-42; control: 43-183) 7 4 546 1557 4.96 (1.43-17.27) 5.17 (1.50-8.84) 1.59 (0.46-2.71)
Extended study period (October 1, 2017 to February 29, 2020)
Primary analysis
Claims-based (all doses) 24 20 2489 6157 2.84 (1.53-5.27) 4.17 (1.65-6.69) 3.13 (0.62-5.64) 1.25 (0.49-2.00) 0.93 (0.18-1.68)
Secondary analysis
Claims-based
First dose only 21 8 1191 3675 7.72 (3.39-17.60)d 8.65 (5.74-11.56)d 6.48 (3.36-9.60)d 3.06 (2.03-4.08)d 2.29 (1.19-3.39)d
Second dose only 3 12 626 1453 0.22 (0.04-1.22)

Abbreviations: GBS, Guillain-Barré syndrome; PPV, positive predictive value; RZV, recombinant zoster vaccine.

a

When calculating second-dose only attributable risks (ARs), we observed a high variance among the estimates from the bootstrapping simulations; the AR estimate for the individual who dies before the beginning of the control window can be infinity, resulting in drastically inflated CI estimates. We have suppressed second-dose only AR estimates for this reason.

b

Unadjusted AR estimates are derived using only the claims-based case classifications and do not take into account the outcome PPV or record return rate.

c

PPV-adjusted AR was calculated by imputing GBS status for all claims-identified cases and cases without medical records using the PPV as the PPV-based quantitative bias sensitivity analysis (eAppendix in Supplement 2).

d

P < .001.