Table 3.
Binary logistic regression models for the contribution of musculoskeletal factors to frailty for women. Data presented as odds ratio (OR, 95% confidence interval (CI))
| Exposures | OR (95% CI) | AUROC | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Femoral neck BMD | |||
| Unadjusted | 0.68 (0.48–0.97) | 0.60 | 0.04 |
| Adjusted- age, weight, height | 0.72 (0.47–1.15) | 0.75 | 0.15 |
| Final Model | * | * | * |
| Ultrasound SOS | |||
| Unadjusted | 0.83 (0.66–1.04) | 0.60 | 0.10 |
| Ultrasound BUA | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.01 (0.93–1.10) | 0.46 | 0.85 |
| Ultrasound SI | |||
| Unadjusted | 1.00 (0.90–1.10) | 0.58 | 0.99 |
| ALMI | |||
| Unadjusted | 0.77 (0.55–1.07) | 0.57 | 0.12 |
| HGS | |||
| Unadjusted | 0.23 (0.16–0.35) | 0.81 | < 0.01 |
| Adjusted- age, height | 0.30 (0.20–0.45) | 0.83 | < 0.01 |
| Final Model | * | * | * |
*Final model same as adjusted model
AUROC Area under the receiver operational characteristic curve, BMD bone mineral density, BUA broad-band ultrasound attenuation, SOS speed of sound, SI stiffness index, ALMI appendicular lean mass index, HGS handgrip strength