Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 2;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12263-021-00695-3

Table 3.

Tertiles of dietary BCAAs in relation to HbA1c according to the genetic risk score in thirds of nested case-control participants

GRS Dietary BCAAs(mg/g protein) Effect size P for trend P for interaction
T1 T2 T3
Total BCAAs 0.038
 < 4 (n = 424) 5.90(0.76) 5.82(1.11) 6.09(1.14) 0.10(0.076) 0.18
 ≥ 4 (n = 444) 5.68(1.06) 6.01(0.74)* 6.13(1.27)* 0.21(0.071) 0.003
Isoleucine 0.041
 < 4 (n = 424) 5.89(0.76) 5.82(1.11) 6.10(1.14) 0.10(0.076) 0.13
 ≥ 4 (n = 444) 5.68(1.06) 6.02(0.75)* 6.13(1.27)* 0.21(0.072) 0.003
Leucine 0.050
 < 4 (n = 424) 5.88(0.76) 5.83(1.11) 6.09(1.14) 0.10(0.075) 0.19
 ≥ 4 (n = 444) 5.68(1.07) 6.01(0.74)* 6.13(1.27)* 0.21(0.071) 0.003
Valine 0.114
 < 4 (n = 424) 5.90(0.76) 5.83(1.10) 6.08(1.14) 0.11(0.077) 0.15
 ≥ 4 (n = 444) 5.73(0.98) 5.96(0.86) 6.13(1.27)* 0.19(0.072) 0.020

General linear model was used for estimation of mean (SD) for HbA1c (%) and linear regression model for β coefficient (SE)

BCAAs, branched chain amino acids; GRS, genetic risk score

Results were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, waist circumference, current drinkers, current smokers, physical activity, diabetes treatment, cardiovascular disease, fruit intakes, poultry intakes, and total energy intakes

∗Comparing to the lowest dietary intake group, P < 0.05