Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Gay Lesbian Soc Serv. 2021 Mar 17;33(4):451–474. doi: 10.1080/10538720.2021.1897052

Table 2.

Coding across cohorts related to four-factor theory of sexual-minority educator interaction.

Younger (n = 33) Middle (n = 19) Older (n = 10) All participants (N = 62) Average n Frequency
n % n % n % n %
Unsupportive 26 79 3 16 5 50 34 55 11.33 Typical
 Individual level 14 42 1 5 3 30 18 29 6.00 Variant
  Explicit 12 36 1 5 3 30 16 26 5.33 Variant
  Implicit 2 6 0 0 0 0 2 3 0.67 Rare
  Academic 5 15 0 0 0 0 5 8 1.67 Variant
  Personal 9 27 1 5 3 30 13 21 4.33 Variant
 School level 12 36 2 10 2 20 16 26 5.33 Variant
  Explicit 11 33 0 0 2 20 13 21 4.33 Variant
  Implicit 1 3 2 10 0 0 3 5 1.00 Rare
  Academic 0 0 1 5 1 10 2 3 0.67 Rare
  Personal 12 36 1 5 1 10 14 23 4.67 Variant
Supportive 14 42 11 58 6 60 31 50 10.33 Typical
 Individual level 6 18 7 37 4 40 17 27 5.67 Variant
  Explicit 6 18 7 37 4 40 17 27 5.67 Variant
  Implicit 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 Rare
  Academic 1 3 0 0 1 10 2 3 0.67 Rare
  Personal 5 15 7 37 3 30 15 24 5.00 Variant
 School level 8 24 4 21 2 20 14 23 4.67 Variant
  Explicit 7 21 4 21 1 10 12 19 4.00 Variant
  Implicit 1 3 0 0 1 10 2 3 0.67 Rare
  Academic 2 6 2 11 1 10 5 8 1.67 Variant
  Personal 6 18 2 11 1 10 9 15 3.00 Variant

Note. n = Number of participants across cohorts reporting type of support and subtype. Descriptive labels for code frequency are: general = all or all but one; typical = more than half; variant = up to half; rare = one to three.