Table 2.
Younger (n = 33) | Middle (n = 19) | Older (n = 10) | All participants (N = 62) | Average n | Frequency | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |||
Unsupportive | 26 | 79 | 3 | 16 | 5 | 50 | 34 | 55 | 11.33 | Typical |
Individual level | 14 | 42 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 30 | 18 | 29 | 6.00 | Variant |
Explicit | 12 | 36 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 30 | 16 | 26 | 5.33 | Variant |
Implicit | 2 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0.67 | Rare |
Academic | 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 8 | 1.67 | Variant |
Personal | 9 | 27 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 30 | 13 | 21 | 4.33 | Variant |
School level | 12 | 36 | 2 | 10 | 2 | 20 | 16 | 26 | 5.33 | Variant |
Explicit | 11 | 33 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 13 | 21 | 4.33 | Variant |
Implicit | 1 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 1.00 | Rare |
Academic | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0.67 | Rare |
Personal | 12 | 36 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 10 | 14 | 23 | 4.67 | Variant |
Supportive | 14 | 42 | 11 | 58 | 6 | 60 | 31 | 50 | 10.33 | Typical |
Individual level | 6 | 18 | 7 | 37 | 4 | 40 | 17 | 27 | 5.67 | Variant |
Explicit | 6 | 18 | 7 | 37 | 4 | 40 | 17 | 27 | 5.67 | Variant |
Implicit | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.00 | Rare |
Academic | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0.67 | Rare |
Personal | 5 | 15 | 7 | 37 | 3 | 30 | 15 | 24 | 5.00 | Variant |
School level | 8 | 24 | 4 | 21 | 2 | 20 | 14 | 23 | 4.67 | Variant |
Explicit | 7 | 21 | 4 | 21 | 1 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 4.00 | Variant |
Implicit | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 2 | 3 | 0.67 | Rare |
Academic | 2 | 6 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 8 | 1.67 | Variant |
Personal | 6 | 18 | 2 | 11 | 1 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 3.00 | Variant |
Note. n = Number of participants across cohorts reporting type of support and subtype. Descriptive labels for code frequency are: general = all or all but one; typical = more than half; variant = up to half; rare = one to three.