Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 21;16:100948. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2021.100948

Table 1.

Characteristics of eligible studies for systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA).

Row First author Country and year of publish Study design Age of participants Sample size exposure outcome Effect measure Effect size Quality Final analysis (SR or MA)
1 Wendi Li China
2016
Cross-sectional between 19 and 33 years 146 Loneliness (UCLA loneliness scale) Internet addition Beta coefficients of Hierarchical regression analysis, Beta: 0.333 among non-ADHD group,
Beta: 0.219 among adult with ADHD, p: 0.017
7 SR and MA
2 Joseph T.F. Laua Hong Kong
2017
prospective 1545 students Loneliness (UCLA(Chen Internet Addiction Scale)) Internet addition Odds ratio of logistic regression adjusted by baseline CIAS score and all socio-demographic backgrounds: OR: 0.93 (0.90,0.95) 8 SR and MA
3 Anthony Iacovelli USA
2009
Cross-sectional undergraduate female students 74 Loneliness Internet addition T-test t(35) = −2.378, p = .023 6 SR
4 Scott Caplan USA
2009
Cross-sectional play MMO games 4000 MMO players Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Problematic Internet use Beta coefficients Beta: .323, t: 21.37 7 SR and MA
5 Hatice Odacı Turkey
2013
Cross-sectional ages ranged between 17 and 23 424 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Problematic Internet use Beta coefficients Beta: −.27
T: −5.3
P: 0.01
5 SR and MA
6 Yalçın Özdemir Turkey
2014
Cross-sectional mean age of 22.46 years 648 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Internet addition correlation R:.32 6 SR and MA
7 Xinxin Shi China
2017
Cross-sectional Mage: 15.771 years old 3289 family functioning and Loneliness as mediator (Asher's Child Loneliness Scale) Internet addiction NA NA 6 SR
8 Binnaz Kiran Esena Turkey, 2013 Cross-sectional university students 507 university students Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Internet addition analysis of Variance (F(2 497)= 19.56, p<.01). 5 SR
9 Ramazan Abac Kosovo and Turkey, 2013 Cross-sectional elderly people Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Internet addition analysis of Variance loneliness level of Turkish people
ANOVA
F:10.13
P:.000 loneliness level between elderly Kosovo people
ANOVA
F:3.11
P:.04
4 SR
10 Melahat Akgün Kostak Turkey, 2018 Cross-sectional students 881 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Problematic Internet use NA NA 7 SR
11 Hatice Odacı Turkey, 2010 Cross-sectional Average age was 17.71 years 493 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Problematic Internet use Correlation R:0.194
P:<0.001
6 SR and MA
12 Mustafa Tevfik Hebebci Turkey, 2018 Cross-sectional Average age: 22 392 Loneliness (Los Angeles (UCLA) Loneliness Scale) Internet addition structural equation modeling (SEM) Beta= .017 7 SR and MA
13 Anam-ul-Malik Pakistan, 2016 Cross-sectional 14–33 years 301 Loneliness (Wittenberg Social and Emotional Loneliness Scale) Internet addition Beta coefficients of Multiple Hierarchical Regression Beta: .13
P: 0.00
7 SR and MA
14 Durmuş Ümmet Turkey, 2016 Cross-sectional average age was 20.64 237 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Internet addition regression analysis regression analysis
F = 48.823, p
<.001
6 SR
15 Jale ELDELEKLIOĞLU Turkey, 2013 Cross-sectional aged between 15 and 18 years 206 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Internet addition Multiple Regression Analysis internet addiction and loneliness (R= .17, p< .05)
Multiple Regression Analysis
T: .775
P:. 439
6 SR and MA
16 Signorelli MS Italy, 2018 Cross-sectional Ages ranged from 13 to 20 years 551 Loneliness (Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS)) Internet addition Odds ratio of Logistic Regression OR: 1.062
P-Value:<.000
6 SR and MA
17 Meltem Huri Baturay Turkey, 2019 Cross-sectional undergraduate students 159 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Internet addition NA NA 5 SR
18 Sun-Mi Cho Korea, 2013 Cohort 14- to 15-year old male 524 male Loneliness IAS(Internet Addiction Scale) Odds ratio OR: 1.155
P < .01
6 SR and MA
19 Dr. Nergüz BULUT SERIN North Cyprus, 2011 Cross-sectional university students 411 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Problematic Internet use Beta coefficients of multiple linear regression analysis Beta: −.041
P:.166
6 SR and MA
20 Dr. Hasan OZGUR Turkey, 2014 Cross-sectional students 311 Loneliness (UCLA-Loneliness Scale III) Problematic Internet use regression analysis [R=.294, R2=.08, F(1,309)=29.159, p<.01]. 7 SR and MA
21 C.C. Frangos Greece, 2011 Cross-sectional mean age 20.12±2.4 years 3545 Loneliness Internet addition Odds ratio OR: 2.15
95% CI=1.67–2.71)
6 SR and MA
22 Yaning Guo China, 2018 Cross-sectional age from 17 to 25 years 1341 Loneliness (emotional loneliness and social loneliness) Internet addition Beta coefficients Beta: .0135
P < .000
7 SR and MA
23 Yujia REN China, 2017 Cross-sectional students 432 Loneliness (Los Angeles Loneliness Scale) Internet addition Correlation R: 0.324
B: 0.13
P: 0.035
8 SR and MA
24 Leo Sang-Min Whang Korea, 2003 Cross-sectional 20–40 age 13,588 Loneliness Internet addition NA NA 6 SR
25 Elizabeth Hardie Australia, 2007 Cross-sectional 18–72 years 96 Loneliness (Wittenberg's Emotional and Social Loneliness Scale) Internet addition NA NA 4 SR
26 Dora K. Prievara Hungary, 2018 Cross-sectional aged between 14 and 24 years 408 Loneliness (UCLA Loneliness Scale) Problematic Internet use Correlation R: .27 5 SR and MA

NA; Not available, SR; systematic review, MA; meta-analysis, OR; Odds ratio, R; Correlation coefficient, Beta; Beta coefficient of Multiple Regression Analysis.