Table 1.
Significance of evidence for the effects of ELS on motivated behaviors in human and rodent model studies.
Behavior | ||
---|---|---|
Rodent | Increased Motivation for Alcohol | STRONG EVIDENCE[7 Supporting Studies: Refs. (105, 116–121)/1 Against: Ref. (122)] |
Increased Motivation for Psychostimulants | STRONG EVIDENCE[5 Supporting Studies: Refs. (100, 107, 111–113)] | |
Increased Motivation for Social Rewards | MODERATE EVIDENCE[1 Supporting Study: Ref. (110)**] | |
Reduced Motivation for Food Rewards | INCONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE[7 Supporting Studies: Refs. (82, 94, 96, 103, 107–109)/4 Against: Refs. (95, 104–106)]* | |
Increased Motivation for Opioids | INCONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE[2 supporting studies: Refs. (106, 123)/1 Against: Ref. (124)] | |
Human | Lower Approach Motivation (Self-Report & Behavioral) | STRONG EVIDENCE[6 Supporting Studies: Refs. (42, 47, 49, 50, 63, 78)] |
Lower Reward Learning Over Time | STRONG EVIDENCE[7 Supporting Studies: Refs. (41, 43–45, 48, 52, 55)] | |
Impulsivity and Excessive Risk-Taking | MODERATE EVIDENCE[3 Supporting Studies: Refs. (48, 51, 53)] |
Sex differences present in results of studies;
To our knowledge, the only study to assess the impact of ELS on a social reward.