Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 2;11:21512. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-00933-z

Table 3.

Coefficients and corresponding t values and p values for 2-back accuracy (d′) and reaction time during and after stimulation. 

Predictors Accuracy Reaction time
β t value p value β t value p value
During stimulation
Stimulation (sham vs. anodal)  − 0.016  − 0.258 0.799  − 2.068  − 0.299 0.769
Age 0.162 2.223 0.038 22.041 1.256 0.224
Visit 1  − 0.172  − 1.234 0.231  − 3.995  − 0.244 0.810
Visit 2 0.025 0.202 0.842  − 16.325  − 1.140 0.269
Visit 3 0.019 0.152 0.880 26.069 1.775 0.093
Stimulation × age  − 0.001  − 0.023 0.982  − 0.144  − 0.038 0.970
After stimulation
Stimulation (sham vs. anodal)  − 0.016  − 0.485 0.634  − 8.478  − 1.545 0.128
Task (con vs. non-con) 0.049 1.453 0.162 11.058 2.005 0.050
Age 0.033 0.720 0.479  − 4.857  − 0.632 0.529
Visit 1 0.000 0.003 0.997 19.157 1.914 0.061
Visit 2 0.088 1.492 0.151 0.693 0.073 0.942
Visit 3 0.039 0.673 0.510  − 24.386  − 2.553 0.013
Stimulation × task 0.007 0.215 0.832  − 4.193  − 0.760 0.450
Stimulation × age  − 0.034  − 1.825 0.086  − 2.307  − 0.757 0.453
Concurrent × age 0.009 0.448 0.659  − 0.505  − 0.166 0.869
Stimulation × task × age 0.004 0.233 0.818  − 1.580  − 0.510 0.612

Significant results are printed in bold.