Skip to main content
. 2021 Aug 25;31(11):1163–1175. doi: 10.1038/s41422-021-00552-3

Fig. 4. Interaction between THIQ and MC4R.

Fig. 4

a Detailed interaction of small-molecule THIQ (cyan) with MC4R (plum). Structure viewed from the extracellular side shows the interaction network of MC4R, THIQ and Ca2+. b Structure comparison of α-MSH with THIQ. The two ligands are aligned by the receptor. c THIQ-induced cAMP accumulation assays of the residues involved in THIQ binding. Bars represent differences in calculated α-MSH potency [pEC50] for each mutant relative to the wild-type receptor (WT). Data are colored according to the extent of effect. nsP > 0.01, *P < 0.01, **P < 0.001 and ***P < 0.0001 (one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test, compared with the response of WT). See Supplementary information, Tables S10 and S11 for detailed statistical evaluation and receptor expression levels.