Table 8.

Quality assessment of economic evaluations with the QHES checklist.

Study	QHES items																Scores
	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12	13	14	15	16
Einarson et al. (15)	√	×	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	81
Lachaine et al. (16)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	93
Park et al. (17)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	93
Dilla et al. (18)	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	85
Anh et al. (19)	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	×	76
Lubinga et al. (20)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	√	87
Druais et al. (21)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	93
Lin et al. (22)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	85
Rajagopalan et al. (23)	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	86
Einarson et al. (24)	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	×	×	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	73
Einarson et al. (25)	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	81
Barnes et al. (26)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	86
Einarson et al. (27)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	86
Einarson et al. (28)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	78
Wiwat et al. (29)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	86
Nuhoho et al. (30)	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	77
Aigbogun et al. (31)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	86
Németh et al. (32)	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	×	√	×	√	√	√	√	70
Zhao et al. (33)	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	78
Abdall-Razak et al. (34)	√	√	×	√	×	√	×	×	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	√	64
Dutina et al. (35)	√	√	×	√	√	√	×	√	×	√	√	√	×	×	√	√	60
Arteaga et al. (36)	√	×	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	96
Yi et al. (37)	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	√	87
Lin et al. (38)	√	×	√	√	√	√	×	×	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	78
Jin et al. (39)	√	×	×	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	√	×	√	√	82
Qualified studies	25/25	20/25	17/25	25/25	24/25	25/25	18/25	12/25	19/25	23/25	22/25	24/25	12/25	17/25	25/25	23/25