Table 1.
Certainty assessment | Number of patients | Effect | Quality of evidence | Importance | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of studies | Study design | Risk of bias | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Other | Lifestyle interventions | Usual care | Relative (95% CI) | Absolute (95% CI) | ||
Dementia | ||||||||||||
1 | Randomised trials | Not serious | Not serious | Not serious | Very serious | None | 11/85 (12.9%) | 17/91 (18.7%) | OR 0.65 (0.28 to 1.48) | 57 fewer per 1.000 (from 126 fewer to 67 more) | ⊕○○○ Ver low | Important |
Cognitive decline (assessed with: various tools) | ||||||||||||
5 | Randomised trials | Not serious | Serious | Serious | Serious | None | The heterogeneity in interventions and outcomes precluded quantitative meta-analysis. None of the included studies found a significant effect of their lifestyle intervention on cognitive decline. | ⊕○○○ Very low | Important |
CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.