Table 6.
Participants: Stroke
survivors Settings: Variety (acute and post-acute) Intervention: Addenbrookes Cognitive Examination Reference standard: Clinical dementia diagnosis or multidomain impairment | ||||||
Study | ACE version Diagnostic cut-off |
Setting | N with PSCI | Accuracy | Risk of bias | GRADE |
Morris et al. (2012) | ACE-R <75 ACE-R <82 ACE-R <88 |
Acute inpatient | 51/61 (84%) | Sens 0.59 Spec 0.40 Sens 0.80 Spec 0.40 Sens 0.90 Spec 0.20 |
High | Very low a |
Pendlebury et al. (2012) | ACE-R <88 ACE-R <90 ACE-R <92 |
Community (stroke and TIA) | 39/91 (42%) | Sens 0.56 Spec 100 Sens 0.67 Spec 0.98 Sens 0.72 Spec 0.79 |
High | |
Goncalves et al. (2015) | ACE-R <72–73 | Neurology department | 18/18 (100%) | Sens 100 Spec 0.92 |
High | |
Lees et al. (2017) | ACE-III <82 | Rehabilitation unit | 27/51 (53%) | Sens 0.93 Spec 0.11 |
High |
aDowngraded due to risk of bias, inconsistency and imprecision.
ACE-R: Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised.