Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 26;2021:2195238. doi: 10.1155/2021/2195238

Table 1.

Morphologic and histopathological renal parameters of the control group and experimental groups. Diameter of glomeruli and thickness of proximal convoluted tubules were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and expressed by mean ± SD. Other parameters were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis test and expressed by median (min–max).

Groups Diameter of glomeruli, μm (mean ± SD) Thickness of proximal convoluted tubules, μm (mean ± SD) Cell necrosis, median (min, max) Eosinophilic casts, median (min, max) Vacuolization, median (min, max) Congestion, median (min, max) Hemorrhage, median (min, max) Leukocyte infiltration, median (min, max)
Control (144/9 ± 9/464) (20/60 ± 6/330) 0.50 (0.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.50 (0.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00)
Gallic acid (135/1 ± 5/494) (15/50 ± 0/4082) 0.50 (0.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.00 (0.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.00 (0.00, 1.00)
Cisplatin (128/1 ± 10/20) (11/47 ± 1/730) 3.00 (3.00, 3.00) 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) 1.00 (1.00, 2.00) 1.00 (1.00, 3.00) 1.00 (0.00, 1.00) 1.00 (0.00, 1.00)
Gallic acid+Cisplatin (138/5 ± 11/57) (16/34 ± 1/058) 1.00 (0.00, 2.00) 0.00 (0.00, 0.00) 0.00 (0.00, 1.00) 0.50 (0.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 1.00) 0.00 (0.00, 1.00)
P value Cnt vs. cis (0.0624)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.2633)
Cnt vs. gal (0.5135)
Cnt vs. cis (0.0022)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.077)
Cnt vs. gal (0.1246)
Cnt vs. cis (0.006)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.001)
Cnt vs. gal (1.000)
Cnt vs. cis (0.006)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.001)
Cnt vs. gal (1.000)
Cnt vs. cis (0.006)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.008)
Cnt vs. gal (0.686)
Cnt vs. cis (0.164)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.101)
Cnt vs. gal (0.343)
Cnt vs. cis (0.412)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.234)
Cnt vs. gal (0.686)
Cnt vs. cis (P = 0.164)
Cis vs. cis-gal (0.234)
Cnt vs. gal (0.686)