Skip to main content
. 2021 Jan 28;27(13):2062–2076. doi: 10.1177/1352458520988637

Table 3.

NO.MS: strengths and limitations of the data set for future analyses.

Strengths Limitations
1. Data set
 - Rich data set from prospectively acquired clinical and imaging trials
 - All MS phenotypes and POMS included
 - High quality assessments and data (study protocols, harmonised assessments and data curation)
 - Broad age- and disability ranges
 - Placebo data (all phenotypes)
 - Randomised-controlled trials as well as observational trials
 - Standardised assessments of relapses and disability (EDSS, including functional scores) by trained physicians
 - Definitions of outcomes relatively standardised or differences understood (since all trials conducted by a single sponsor), enabling data harmonisation or selection for analysis
 - MRI scans (defaced) available in NIFTI format for unified image analyses
 - Additional valuable data on measures such as cognition, PROs and biomarker
1. Data set
 - Selection bias: Patients represent selected populations based on the eligibility criteria of study protocols and may be non-representative of routine clinical practice (including selective DMT use)
 - Studies conducted by single sponsor
 - Limited biological and genetic characterisation
 - Study populations may change over time (e.g. to less activity)
2. Follow-up duration
 - Long (up to 15 years) follow-up
 - Patient-level longitudinal high quality clinical data, including regular standardised neurological assessments
 - Includes RRMS patients who transitioned to SPMS while on trial, allowing to study the onset of progressive disease
 - Patient-level longitudinal MRI scans (defaced) available in NIFTI format to support re-analysis of MRI scans and linkable to the de-identified clinical data
2. Follow-up duration
 - Variable longitudinal follow-up
 - Informative censoring is a possibility in some cases
 - Limited follow-up in PMS cohorts (additional long-term data are being collected in SPMS)
3. Data analysis
 - Longitudinal, harmonised, robust and scalable voxel-wise analysis of MRI scans across studies is ongoing to extract new features
 - Applicable for advanced analytical approaches including supervised and unsupervised machine learning on top of conventional approaches
3. Data analysis
 - Challenging as MRI scans are heterogeneous from multicentre trials over almost 20 years (scanner/software, sites and resolution)

DMT: disease modifying therapy; EDSS: expanded disability status scale; MRI: magnetic resonance imaging; MS: multiple sclerosis; PMS: progressive MS; POMS: paediatric-onset MS; PRO: patient-reported outcomes; SPMS: secondary progressive MS.