TABLE 2.
Identified hurdles in the three cases of drug repurposing for rare diseases. CTLA-4 HIS: cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen four haploinsufficiency. PXE: pseudoxanthoma elasticum. NDM: Non-dystrophic myotonia.
| Hurdles | Abatacept CTLA-4 HIS | Etidronate PXE | Mexiletine NDM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Healthcare professionals involved in drug repurposing | 1. Lack of knowledge of and alignment with the regulatory and reimbursement frameworks | Obtaining reimbursement is challenging and time-consuming | No incentive for clinicians to engage in regulatory activities | — |
| 2. Off-label use is not a major concern if sufficiently supported by scientific evidence. This slows down evidence development | Consensus amongst doctors based upon pathophysiological mechanisms | Unavailability hampers clinical use and scientific development | Has been used off-label since the 1980s | |
| Private sector | 3. Private actors do not invest because of uncertain regulatory and reimbursement outcomes | Viable business case not likely due to patent expiration | — | — |
| 4. Failure to register an old drug for a fair price, resulting in commercialization as a high priced orphan drug | — | — | Price increase as a result of monopoly position | |
| Payers | 5. Hesitant to pay for off-label use, when scientific evidence is limited | Reimbursement only on case-by-case basis | — | — |
| Regulators | 6. Regulatory frameworks not fully adapted for repurposing, both in terms of processes and data/evidence requirements | Case studies not eligible for regulatory purposes | Investigator-initiated trial not eligible for regulatory purposes | — |
| 7. Regulators are not used to other types of applicants than industry, e.g. academics, doctors, public-private partnerships | — | No appropriate guidance or timing of interaction | — |