Table 5. In situ ruminal degradation parameters and effective starch ruminal degradability.
| Parameter | Treatment1) | SEM | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ground | Flake_62 | Flake_66 | Overall | Ground vs. Flake | ||
| Factor2) | ||||||
| A | 47.2a | 2.1b | 4.0b | 1.01 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| B | 48.1 | 69.3 | 69.5 | 6.57 | 0.154 | 0.080 |
| kd | 0.13 | 0.08 | 0.08 | 0.015 | 0.185 | 0.098 |
| Effective degradability3) | ||||||
| 0.04 | 83.9a | 48.2b | 49.7b | 3.09 | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| 0.06 | 80.1a | 41.6b | 43.0b | 2.45 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| 0.08 | 77.0a | 36.6b | 38.1b | 2.01 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Ground, ground corn; Flake_(% gelatinization).
A, soluble fraction (% DM); B, slowly degradable fraction (% DM); kd, fractional rate of degradation (h−1).
Effective ruminal degradability when fractional rate of passage is 0.04 h−1, 0.06 h−1, and 0.08 h−1, respectively.
Means that do not have common superscript differ (p < 0.05).
DM, dry matter.