Table 6. In situ ruminal degradation parameters and effective dry matter ruminal degradability.
| Parameter | Treatment1) | SEM | p-value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ground | Flake_62 | Flake_66 | Overall | Ground vs. Flake | ||
| Factor2) | ||||||
| A | 45.5a | 3.2b | 2.3b | 1.17 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| B | 44.3 | 71.8 | 63.2 | 7.15 | 0.117 | 0.066 |
| kd | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.08 | 0.021 | 0.204 | 0.114 |
| Effective degradability3) | ||||||
| 0.04 | 79.6a | 46.3b | 44.1b | 3.51 | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| 0.06 | 76.1a | 39.2b | 38.1b | 2.73 | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| 0.08 | 73.3a | 34.1b | 33.6b | 2.20 | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Ground, ground corn; Flake_(% gelatinization).
A, soluble fraction (% DM); B, slowly degradable fraction (% DM); kd, fractional rate of degradation (h−1).
Effective ruminal degradability when fractional rate of passage is 0.04 h−1, 0.06 h−1, and 0.08 h−1, respectively.
Means that do not have common superscript differ (p < 0.05).
DM, dry matter.