Table 2.
The Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS).
| References | Selection | Comparability | Exposure | Scores | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adequate definition of cases | Representativeness of the cases | Selection of controls | Definition of controls | Control for important factor | Ascertainment of exposure | Same method of ascertainment for cases and controls | Non-response rate | ||
| Hagemeier et al., 2016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– | 7 |
| Vasavada et al., 2015 |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
– | 7 |
| Wu et al., 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– | 8 |
| Yu et al., 2019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
– | 8 |
| Murphy et al., 2003 |
|
|
– |
|
|
|
|
– | 6 |
| Selection | Comparability | Outcome | |||||||
| Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the non-exposed cohort | Ascertainment of exposure | Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study | Comparability of cohorts on the basis of the design or analysis | Assessment of outcome | Enough follow-up of cohorts | Adequacy of follow-up of cohorts | ||
| Devanand et al., 2010 |
|
– |
|
– |
|
|
|
– | 6 |
| Marigliano et al., 2014 |
|
– |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
A study can be awarded a maximum of one star for each numbered item within the selection and exposure categories. A maximum of two stars can be given for comparability.