Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 20;12:723394. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.723394

Table 5.

Risk of inconclusive FNAC of FTI (random effects, I2 = 92%, symbol size reflects weight).

Study FNAC Inconclusive ROIF [95% CI]
Yoon et al. (58) 87 6 6.90 [1.37, 12.43] graphic file with name fendo-12-723394-i003.jpg
Achury et al. (44) 23 2 8.70 [-3.35, 20.75]
Kim et al. (42) 177 23 1 2.99 [7.68, 1 8.30]
Kim et al. (56) 200 26 13.00 [8.00, 18.00]
Kim et al. (42) 286 38 1 3.29 [9.06, 1 7.52]
Sencan Eren et al. (63) 43 6 13.95 [2.78, 25.1 2]
Jamsek et al. (55) 52 10 19.23 [7.31, 31.1 5]
Czepczyński et al. (26) 20 4 20.00 [0.40, 39.60]
Stangierski et al. (49) 82 17 20.73 [10.87, 30.59]
Nishimori et al. (30) 38 8 21.05 [6.47, 35.63]
Flukes et al. (61) 53 14 26.42 [12.58, 40.26]
Ozderya et al. (68) 76 24 31 .58 [18.94, 44.22]
Thuillier et al. (71) 60 21 35.00 [20.03, 49.97]
Chung et al. (72) 1364 522 38.27 [34.98, 41.56]
Kamakshi et al. (82) 29 13 44.83 [20.47, 69.19]
Summary 20.81 [13.70, 27.92]

FNAC, Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology; ROIF, Risk of Inconclusive FNAC.