TABLE 4.
Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for parenting stress and attachment styles to predict children’s social communication abilities.
| Panel (a) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
Tests of Model Coefficients
|
|||||
| B | SE(B) | Beta | t-value | Sign. | |
|
| |||||
| Step 1 (R2 = 0.01; F = 3.79) | |||||
| Parenting Distress (PD) | 0.039 | 0.020 | 0.103 | 1.947 | 0.058 |
| Step 2 (R2 = 03; F = 2.22) | |||||
| Parenting Distress (PD) | 0.025 | 0.023 | 0.065 | 1.056 | 0.300 |
| Security (SEC) | −0.059 | 0.041 | −0.087 | −1.422 | 0.146 |
| Avoidance (AVO) | 0.047 | 0.034 | 0.095 | 1.408 | 0.218 |
| Anxiey (ANX) | −0.034 | 0.039 | −0.063 | −0.887 | 0.386 |
|
| |||||
| Panel (b) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
Tests of Model Coefficients
|
|||||
| B | SE(B) | Beta | t-value | Sign. | |
|
| |||||
| Step 1 (R2 = 0.03; F = 10.52) | |||||
| Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (P-CDI) | 0.109 | 0.034 | 0.170 | 3.24 | 0.001 |
| Step 2 (R2 = 0.04; F = 3.50) | |||||
| Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (P-CDI) | 0.089 | 0.036 | 0.139 | 2.472 | ,010 |
| Security (SEC) | −0.052 | 0.040 | −0.077 | −1.287 | 0.282 |
| Avoidance (AVO) | 0.035 | 0.034 | 0.071 | 1.050 | 0.351 |
| Anxiey (ANX) | −0.028 | 0.037 | −0.052 | −0.769 | 0.546 |
|
| |||||
| Panel (c) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
Tests of Model Coefficients
|
|||||
| B | SE(B) | Beta | t-value | Sign. | |
|
| |||||
| Step 1 (R2 = 0.01; F = 2.15) | |||||
| Difficult Child (DC) | 0.042 | 0.028 | 0.078 | 1.466 | 0.160 |
| Step 2 (R2 = 02; F = 2.13) | |||||
| Difficult Child (DC) | 0.026 | 0.031 | 0.049 | −0.859 | 0.412 |
| Security (SEC) | −0.066 | 0.040 | −0.098 | −1.641 | 0.111 |
| Avoidance (AVO) | 0.047 | 0.034 | −0.094 | 1.394 | 0.191 |
| Anxiey (ANX) | 0.030 | 0.038 | −0.054 | −0.778 | 0.448 |
N = 355; PD, Parenting Distress (PSI-SF); P-CDI, Parent–Child Dysfunctional Interaction (PSI-SF); DC, Difficult Child: (PSI-SF); SEC, Security (ASQ); AVO, Avoidance (ASQ); ANX, Anxiety (ASQ); SC Dom, Social Communication Domain (FYI); and SR Dom, Sensory Regulatory Functions Domain (FYI).