TABLE 5.
Summary of hierarchical regression analysis for parenting stress and attachment styles to predict children’s regulatory functions.
| Panel (a) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
Tests of Model Coefficients
|
|||||
| B | SE(B) | Beta | t-value | Sign. | |
|
| |||||
| Step 1 (R2 = 0.09; F = 35.81) | |||||
| Parenting Distress (PD) | 0.185 | 0.031 | 0.303 | 5.984 | 0.000 |
| Step 2 (R2 = 0.14; F = 14.21) | |||||
| Parenting Distress (PD) | 0.121 | 0.035 | 0.198 | 3.405 | 0.001 |
| Security (SEC) | 0.059 | 0.063 | 0.054 | 0.947 | 0.468 |
| Avoidance (AVO) | 0.108 | 0.051 | 0.135 | 2.124 | 0.088 |
| Anxiey (ANX) | 0.141 | 0.059 | 0.159 | 2.387 | 0.016 |
|
| |||||
| Panel (b) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
Tests of Model Coefficients
|
|||||
| B | SE(B) | Beta | t-value | Sign. | |
|
| |||||
| Step 1 (R2 = 0.13; F = 52.89) | |||||
| Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (P-CDI) | 0.373 | 0.051 | 0.361 | 7.272 | 0.000 |
| Step 2 (R2 = 0.19; F = 19.95) | |||||
| Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction (P-CDI) | 0.303 | 0.054 | 0.294 | 5.656 | 0.011 |
| Security (SEC) | 0.068 | 0.060 | 0.062 | 1.124 | 0.305 |
| Avoidance (AVO) | 0.072 | 0.050 | 0.089 | 1.424 | 0.350 |
| Anxiey (ANX) | 0.180 | 0.055 | 0.204 | 3.296 | 0.001 |
|
| |||||
| Panel (c) | |||||
|
| |||||
|
Tests of Model Coefficients
|
|||||
| B | SE(B) | Beta | t-value | Sign. | |
|
| |||||
| Step 1 (R2 = 0.19; F = 84.50) | |||||
| Difficult Child (DC) | 0.381 | 0.042 | 0.439 | 9.192 | 0.000 |
| Step 2 (R2 = 0.23; F = 25.54) | |||||
| Difficult Child (DC) | 0.319 | 0.044 | 0.367 | 7.203 | 0.000 |
| Security (SEC) | 0.032 | 0.058 | 0.029 | 0.548 | 0.741 |
| Avoidance (AVO) | 0.087 | 0.048 | 0.108 | 1.800 | 0.161 |
| Anxiey (ANX) | 0.109 | 0.055 | 0.123 | 1.985 | 0.042 |
N = 355; PD, Parental Distress (PSI-SF); P-CDI, Parent–Child Dysfunctional Interaction (PSI-SF); DC, Difficult Child (PSI-SF); SEC, Security (ASQ); AVO, Avoidance (ASQ); ANX, Anxiety (ASQ); SC Dom, Social Communication Domain (FYI); and SR Dom, Sensory Regulatory Functions Domain (FYI).