Table 3.
Carotid intima-media thickness* | |||
---|---|---|---|
β coefficient | 95% CI | p-value | |
GDF-15 | |||
Model 1 | 0.13 | (0.06 to 0.21) | < 0.001 |
Model 2 | 0.07 | (− 0.05 to 0.18) | 0.237 |
Model 3 | 0.06 | (− 0.05 to 0.18) | 0.274 |
Coronary artery calcium score** | |||
---|---|---|---|
OR | 95% CI | p-value | |
GDF-15 | |||
Model 1 | 1.70 | (1.34 to 2.33) | < 0.001 |
Model 2 | 1.50 | (1.11 to 2.13) | 0.013 |
Model 3 | 1.56 | (1.14 to 2.27) | 0.010 |
TBRmax (carotid arteries)* | |||
---|---|---|---|
β coefficient | 95% CI | p-value | |
NLR | |||
Model 1 | 0.13 | (0.02 to 0.24) | 0.021 |
Model 2 | 0.11 | (0.01 to 0.22) | 0.039 |
Model 3 | 0.11 | (0.00 to 0.22) | 0.044 |
Model 1, crude results; Model 2, after adjustment for the America College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) risk score; Model 3, after adjustment for ACC/AHA risk score and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
TBRmax maximum target-to-background ratio, OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval.
*Linear -and multivariable regression models were performed to assess the association between GDF-15 and NLR and carotid intima-media thickness and vascular inflammation, respectively, in the carotid arteries.
**Ordinal logistic regression was performed to assess the association between GDF-15 and the coronary artery calcium score.