Table 1.
Decision-making processes and appraisal methods used for selecting digital mental health interventions for youth identified during stakeholder interviews.
| Process or appraisal method | The rationale for process or appraisal | |
| Frameworks | ||
|
|
Mental Health Commission of Canada Toolkit | The toolkit can reduce clinician workload, ensure resources are evidence-based, increase interoperability, and provide valuable information for those with limited experience with digital mental health. |
|
|
Homewood Research Institute App Evaluation Framework | Used to evaluate the effectiveness of mental health apps and identifies the highest quality apps. Focuses on measuring outcomes, design and transparency, design methodology, and operational considerations of each application. |
| Selection criteria | ||
|
|
Evidence base | Resources that are evidence-based and have supporting literature are often more accepted for use in clinical settings. |
|
|
Accessibility | Providers and researchers must consider the cost and technology requirements associated with recommending a digital intervention. |
|
|
Visual appeal | Mobile apps and web-based resources should host bright and catchy graphics, including music and characters, to grab the attention of youth. |
|
|
Feedback from youth | Recommendations should be developed based on feedback from youth about what they are looking for and the apps they are already using. |
| Cultural relevance | When serving youth, including BIPOC,a further considerations must be made to ensure that the digital resource/intervention considers specific needs of various cultural and racial minority groups. | |
aBIPOC: Black, Indigenous, and people of color.