Skip to main content
. 2020 Jun 16;9:618. [Version 1] doi: 10.12688/f1000research.23181.1

Table 3. Comparison of precision for migraine classifications reported in previous studies.

Reference study Classification
model
Precision
Migraine diagnosis support system based on
classifier ensemble ( Jackowski et al., 2014)
LAD Tree 75.9%
Automatic diagnosis of primary headaches by
machine learning methods ( Krawczyk et al., 2013)
Random Forest 81%
Analysis of repetitive flash stimulation frequencies
and record periods to detect migraine using
artificial neural network ( Akben et al., 2012)
ANN 83.3%
Classification of multi-channel EEG signals for
migraine detection ( Akben et al., 2016)
SVM 85%
Effect of photic stimulation for migraine detection
using random forest and discrete wavelet
transform ( Subasi et al., 2019)
Random Forest 85.95%
Analysis of Artificial Neural Networks Models, for a
System of Diagnoses of Migraines with Aura and
without Aura ( De la Hoz & Rúa et al., 2014)
ANN 91.04%
A clinical decision support system for the
diagnosis of probable migraine and probable
tension-type headache based on case-based
reasoning ( Yin et al., 2015)
CBR 93.14%
This study ANN (complete) 97%
This study ANN (reduced) 98%

LAD - least absolute deviations, ANN – artificial neural network, SVM – support vector machine, CBR – case-based reasoning