Table 3. Comparison of precision for migraine classifications reported in previous studies.
Reference study | Classification
model |
Precision |
---|---|---|
Migraine diagnosis support system based on
classifier ensemble ( Jackowski et al., 2014) |
LAD Tree | 75.9% |
Automatic diagnosis of primary headaches by
machine learning methods ( Krawczyk et al., 2013) |
Random Forest | 81% |
Analysis of repetitive flash stimulation frequencies
and record periods to detect migraine using artificial neural network ( Akben et al., 2012) |
ANN | 83.3% |
Classification of multi-channel EEG signals for
migraine detection ( Akben et al., 2016) |
SVM | 85% |
Effect of photic stimulation for migraine detection
using random forest and discrete wavelet transform ( Subasi et al., 2019) |
Random Forest | 85.95% |
Analysis of Artificial Neural Networks Models, for a
System of Diagnoses of Migraines with Aura and without Aura ( De la Hoz & Rúa et al., 2014) |
ANN | 91.04% |
A clinical decision support system for the
diagnosis of probable migraine and probable tension-type headache based on case-based reasoning ( Yin et al., 2015) |
CBR | 93.14% |
This study | ANN (complete) | 97% |
This study | ANN (reduced) | 98% |
LAD - least absolute deviations, ANN – artificial neural network, SVM – support vector machine, CBR – case-based reasoning