Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 3;32(3):438–451. doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-10010-x

Table 2.

Overview of themes and related contextual factors

Theme Contextual factors
The importance of addressing problems on multiple life domains among employees with a lower SEP

• Problems on multiple life domains are recognized among employees with a lower SEP

• Addressing problems among employees with a lower SEP requires more attention

• Difficulty to solve problems on multiple life domains among employees with a lower SEP

• Employees with a lower SEP are hard to reach for participation in preventive interventions

Unclarity of responsibilities for solving problems on multiple life domains

• Low sense of responsibility experienced in occupational health services

• Employers eventually determine the content of occupational services provided

• Employers who see their employees as valuable feel responsible

• Employers with sufficient resources feel responsible

• Employers of employees with a lower SEP do not always act in the interests of employees

• Low sense of responsibility experienced in small and medium sized enterprises

• Limited influence of employees with a lower SEP on occupational health policies

• Low sense of responsibility experienced in occupational and curative healthcare

Necessity of better collaboration between occupational and curative health care

• Two separate options to discuss problems on multiple life domains

• Lack of collaboration between occupational and curative healthcare

• Collaboration between occupational and curative healthcare is perceived difficult

Insufficient investments in prevention by employers

• Prevention of health problems and (long-term) sick leave is an important priority

• Lack of attention for prevention in contracts

• Less resources for prevention in smaller organizations or organizations in a crisis

• Employers not seeing their employees as valuable invest less in prevention

• Results of prevention are often unclear and cannot always be quantified

• Employers focus on short term results and only act in case there are problems

• Employers without support from key stakeholders in organizations difficult to convince to invest in prevention

Difficulties in early identification of employees at risk for health problems

• Methods for the identification of employees at risk mainly focus on indicated prevention

• Limited availability of occupational physicians to preventively address problems on multiple life domains

• Occupational social workers or occupational nurses more accessible than occupational physicians to preventively address problems on multiple life domains

• Organizations not always willing to invest in preventive conversations with occupational health professionals or in preventive interventions

Risk of conflicting role for supervisors in addressing problems on multiple life domains

• Supervisors play an important role in the early identification of workers at risk for health problems

• Supervisors play an important role in referring employees to an OHP on time

• Supervisors discussing problems on multiple life domains may disadvantage employees

• Privacy regulations to discuss problems on multiple life domains are unclear