Table 4.
Nearest-neighbour propensity score matching: common support and bias reduction*
| Matched BFP |
Matched Non-BFP |
Bias | Bias | Bias reduction | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
On support
|
Off support
|
On support
|
Off support
|
Before matching
|
After matching
|
|
||
|
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
N
|
Mean
|
Mean
|
%
|
||
|
Externalising problems:
| |||||||||
| SDQ-Externalising problems† |
849 |
24 |
1190 |
0 |
31.2 |
5.1 |
76.1 |
||
| SDQ-Less prosocial‡ |
849 |
24 |
1190 |
0 |
31.2 |
5.1 |
76.1 |
||
| Violent behaviour§ |
819 |
33 |
1155 |
0 |
31.3 |
4.4 |
80.9 |
||
|
Socio-emotional competencies:
| |||||||||
| Social aptitudes |
847 |
21 |
1184 |
0 |
31.1 |
6.1 |
63.3 |
||
| Positive attributes |
850 |
22 |
1190 |
0 |
31.2 |
4.0 |
77.2 |
||
| Locus of control‖ | 806 | 21 |
1132 | 0 |
31.1 | 5.9 | 72.5 | ||
BFP – Bolsa Família Programme, N – number of observations, SDQ – Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire
*Matched by sex, ethnicity, maternal schooling, household wealth score, maternal age at childbirth, maternal depressive symptoms, and number of live children at birth.
†Conduct plus hyperactivity items.
‡Prosocial subscale is reverse scored.
§Any 12-month physical aggression that caused injuries, N = 2007 adolescent report.
‖N = 1959 adolescent report.