Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2021 Jun 19;220:104982. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104982

Table 1.

Results during NP2 encoding in the 300–500 ms time window.

Predictor Results

Age F(1,78) = 11.10, p = .001
Phonological Similarity F(1,78) = 3.56, p = .06
Gender Congruence F(1,78) = .82, p = .37
Age × Phonological Similarity F(1,78) = 1.59, p = .28
Age × Gender Congruence F(1,78) = 2.16, p = .15
Phonological Similarity × Gender Congruence F(1,78) = .84, p = .36
Age × Phonological Similarity × Gender Congruence F(1,78) = 2.14, p = .15
Age × Brain Region F(1.20,93.67) = 13.16, p <.001
 Age effect at frontal regions F(1,78) = 21.9, p <.001
 Age effect at central regions F(1,78) = 7.39, p = .008
 Age effect at parietal regions F(1,78) = .04, p = .83
Phonological Similarity × Brain Region F(1.32,103.10) = 19.61, p < .001
 Phonological Similarity effect at frontal regions F(1,79) = 15.46, p < .001
 Phonological Similarity effect at central regions F(1,79) = 2.37, p = .13
 Phonological Similarity effect at parietal regions F(1,79) = .70, p = .40