Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Lang. 2021 Jun 19;220:104982. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2021.104982

Table 2.

Results during pronoun processing in the 700–1100 ms time window.

Predictor Results

Age F(1,78) = .51, p = .48
Phonological Similarity F(1,78) = .05, p = .83
Pronominal Ambiguity F(1,78) = .09, p = .77
Age × Phonological Similarity F(1,78) = 18.43, p < .001
 Similarity effect for younger adults F(1,39) = 5.65, p =.02
 Similarity effect for older adults F(1,39) = 19.10, p < .001
Phonological Similarity × Pronominal Ambiguity F(1,78) = .30, p = .58
Age × Phonological Similarity × Pronominal Ambiguity F(1,78) = 1, p = .32
Age × Brain Region F(1.27,99.42) = 12.52, p <.001
 Age effect at frontal regions F(1,78) = 6.82, p = .01
 Age effect at central regions F(1,78) = .14, p = .73
 Age effect at parietal regions F(1,78) = 2.27, p = .14
Phonological Similarity × Brain Region F(1.11,86.21) = 8.72, p = .003
 Phonological Similarity effect at frontal regions F(1,79) = 3.06, p = .08
 Phonological Similarity effect at central regions F(1,79) = .36, p = .55
 Phonological Similarity effect at parietal regions F(1,79) = 4.31, p = .04