Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;65(4):1301–1312. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180570

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics

HC T2DM AD Significance Tests
df F ratio p-value Tukey’s HSD
Number (#) 27 28 22
Female # (%) 12 (44%) 13 (46%) 13 (59%) N = 77, df = 2, 2-tailed p = 0.578; Fisher’s Exact Test
Age (y) 61.7 ± 1.6 66.3 ± 1.5 69.6 ± 1.7 2,74 5.96 0.004 HC<AD
MMSE (#/30) 29.4 ± 0.3 29.0 ± 0.3 21.8 ± 0.3 2,74 196.90 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
GDS (#/15) 0.5 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.3 2.4 ± 0.4 2,74 7.31 0.001 HC<AD
Education (y) 15.8 ± 0.6 15.5 ± 0.5 16.6 ± 0.6 2,74 0.86 0.429
Premorbid IQ (W-TAR) 113.6 ± 2.4 112.2 ± 2.4 108.2 ± 2.7 2,74 1.19 0.311
Network ROI thicknesses (mm)
 Limbic NOI Thickness 2.5 ± 0.03 2.5 ± 0.03 2.4 ± 0.03 2,74 11.70 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
 Default NOI Thickness 2.4 ± 0.02 2.4 ± 0.02 2.3 ± 0.02 2,74 15.60 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
 Frontoparietal NOI Thickness 2.3 ± 0.02 2.2 ± 0.02 2.1 ± 0.02 2,74 17.90 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
Hippocampal Volume (z-scores)
 RH hippocampal volume/eTIV 0.4 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.2 −0.8 ± 0.2 2,74 15.50 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
 LH hippocampal volume/eTIV 0.4 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.2 −0.9 ± 0.2 2,74 20.00 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
Global Cognition (z-scores)
 ADAS-Cog Total (inverse) 0.6 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.1 −1.2 ± 0.1 2,74 75.30 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
Memory Composite (z-scores) 0.7 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 −1.1 ± 0.1 2,74 85.11 <0.001 AD<T2DM<HC
 RAVLT Immediate Recall 0.7 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 −1.2 ± 0.1 2,74 65.10 <0.001 AD<T2DM<HC
 RAVLT Delayed Recall 0.6 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1 −1.1 ± 0.1 2,74 43.00 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
 RAVLT Delayed Recognition 0.6 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 −1.0 ± 0.2 2,73 30.30 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
 LMS Immediate Recall 0.8 ± 0.1 0.05 ± 0.1 −1.0 ± 0.2 2,74 36.08 <0.001 AD<T2DM<HC
 LMS Delayed Recall 0.7 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 −1.0 ± 0.2 2,74 33.10 <0.001 AD<T2DM<HC
 ADAS-Cog Immediate Recall (inverse) 0.8 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 −1.2 ± 0.1 2,73 66.60 <0.001 AD<T2DM<HC
 ADAS-Cog Delayed Recognition (inverse) 0.4 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.2 −1.0 ± 0.2 2,73 19.80 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
Executive Composite (z-scores) 0.6 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 −1.2 ± 0.1 2,74 60.20 <0.001 AD<T2DM<HC
 DSB Length 0.5 ± 0.2 0.05 ± 0.2 −0.7 ± 0.2 2,74 12.10 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM
 DSST 0.7 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 −1.2 ± 0.1 2,73 59.50 <0.001 AD<T2DM<HC
 TMT B-A (inverse) 0.5 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1 −1.4 ± 0.2 2,67 50.00 <0.001 AD<HC, T2DM

Gender proportions are shown using Fisher’s exact test. All other results are presented as Mean ± Std error generated from ANOVA. Significant values with p < 0.05 are shown in bold, and are further characterized using Tukey’s HSD to compare means between all three groups.