Table 4.
Quality evaluation of the included studies for the meta-analysis.
| Quality (NOS) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Study | Selection (4*) | Comparability (3*) | Exposure (2*) |
| Huang et al. (19) | **** | ** | |
| Valentino, 2017 (30) | *** | ** | ** |
| Majed et al. (13) | ** | ** | |
| Liang et al. (26) | **** | * | ** |
| Kovacs et al. (20) | **** | ** | |
| Jarius et al. (12) | *** | ** | |
| Jarius et al. (16) | *** | ** | |
| Isobe et al. (25) | *** | ** | |
| Isobe et al. (29) | **** | ** | |
| Chanson (31) | **** | ** | ** |
| Akaishi et al. (24) | ** | * | ** |
| Takahashi et al. (15) | *** | * | ** |
| Dujmovic et al. (22) | *** | * | ** |
| Li et al. (21) | *** | ** | |
Each study is scored using a star system based on three domains: (1) selection of study groups—maximum 4*; (2) comparability of the groups—maximum 2*; (3) ascertainment of outcome—maximum 3*. NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa Scale.