Table 1.
Impact of SnRK1 on Tre6P:sucrose ratios
Genotype | Time of day | Tre6P (nmol g-1 FW) |
Sucrose (μmol g-1 FW) |
Tre6P:Sucrose |
P-value (versus control) |
Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Col-0 | ED | 0.401 ± 0.08 | 2.083 ± 0.28 | 0.195 ± 0.04 | NA | Figure 1 (n = 8) |
EN | 0.099 ± 0.02 | 0.843 ± 0.14 | 0.119 ± 0.03 | NA | Figure 1 (n = 10) | |
SnRK1α1-OE | ED | 0.981 ± 0.31 | 2.584 ± 0.34 | 0.376 ± 0.10 | 6.00E−04 | Figure 1 (n = 8) |
EN | 0.159 ± 0.05 | 0.939 ± 0.16 | 0.170 ± 0.04 | 1.15E−02 | Figure 1 (n = 10) | |
sesquiα2 | ED | 0.114 ± 0.01 | 1.678 ± 0.20 | 0.069 ± 0.01 | 2.00E−04 | Figure 1 (n = 8) |
EN | 0.037 ± 0.02 | 0.749 ± 0.09 | 0.047 ± 0.03 | 3.00E−04 | Figure 1 (n = 10) | |
| ||||||
Genotype | Time of day | Tre6P (nmol g-1 FW) |
Sucrose (μmol g-1 FW) |
Tre6P:Sucrose |
P-value (versus control) |
Reference |
| ||||||
Col-0 | ED | 0.417 ± 0.06 | 1.802 ± 0.29 | 0.232 ± 0.02 | NA | Yadav et al. (n = 5) |
EN | 0.097 ± 0.01 | 0.729 ± 0.11 | 0.134 ± 0.00 | NA | Yadav et al. (n = 5) | |
TPS-OE | ED | 2.388 ± 0.27 | 1.222 ± 0.11 | 1.955 ± 0.16 | 1.60E−02 | Yadav et al. (n = 4) |
EN | 1.025 ± 0.34 | 0.362 ± 0.10 | 2.831 ± 0.53 | 7.90E−03 | Yadav et al. (n = 5) | |
TPP-OE | ED | 0.399 ± 0.04 | 3.423 ± 0.52 | 0.118 ± 0.02 | 7.90E−03 | Yadav et al. (n = 5) |
EN | 0.088 ± 0.02 | 0.995 ± 0.13 | 0.088 ± 0.01 | 7.90E−03 | Yadav et al. (n = 5) |
Yadav et al., 2014; 12:12 conditions.
Ratios are means ± sd and were calculated using only ED (12 h and 36 h after first dawn), and EN (24 h and 48 h after first dawn) time points. P-values refer to statistically significant differences (Student’s t test) between Col-0 and each of the indicated SnRK1 mutants. These data are graphically represented in Figure 1C, and use the Tre6P and sucrose values of Figure 1, A and B. The values previously obtained for plants with altered Tre6P accumulation (TPS-OE and TPP-OE, 12:12 photoperiod, EN and ED) by Yadav et al. (2014) are also shown for comparison. FW, Fresh weight. Sucrose levels correspond to hexose equivalents.