Table 2.
Impact of SnRK1 on the Tre6P–sucrose relationship
| Genotype | R | P-value | Slope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Col-0 | 0.95 | 2.60E−09 | 3.80 |
| SnRK1α1-OE | 0.94 | 5.00E−09 | 1.80 |
| sesquiα2 | 0.86 | 3.90E−06 | 9.70 |
|
| |||
| Genotype | R | P-value | Slope |
|
| |||
| Col-0 (Yadav et al.) | 0.99 | 1.90E−07 | 3.40 |
| TPS-OE (Yadav et al.) | 0.97 | 1.90E−05 | 0.58 |
| TPP-OE (Yadav et al.) | 0.96 | 7.90E−06 | 7.70 |
The Tre6P content of Col-0, SnRK1α1-OE, and sesquiα2 rosettes at ED (12 h and 36 h after first dawn), and EN (24 h and 48 h after first dawn) was plotted against the corresponding values of sucrose. R, Pearson correlation coefficient. Slope, slopes of the corresponding Tre6P–sucrose regression curves (Figure 1C). Data previously obtained for the TPS-OE and TPP-OE lines by Yadav et al. (2014) are also shown for comparison.