Table 4.
ID | Symbol | Description | Response to S deficiencya | sesquiα2 ED | sesquiα2 EN |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
AT5G48850 | ATSDI1 | SULFUR DEFICIENCY-INDUCED 1 | UP (leaves) | – | 1.95 |
AT3G49580 | LSU1 | RESPONSE TO LOW SULFUR 1 | UP (leaves) | – | 2.14 |
AT3G49570 | LSU3 | RESPONSE TO LOW SULFUR 3 | UP (leaves) | – | 2.17 |
AT5G26220 | GGCT2;1 | GAMMA-GLUTAMYL CYCLOTRANSFERASE 2;1 | UP (leaves) | – | 2.21 |
AT3G08860 | PYD4 | PYRIMIDINE 4 | UP (leaves) | 2.69 | 3.21 |
AT4G35640 | SERAT3;2 | SERINE ACETYLTRANSFERASE 3;2 | UP (leaves) | – | 1.04 |
AT4G31330 | Putative transmembrne protein (DUF599) | UP (leaves) | – | 1.21 | |
AT1G12030 | Putative phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (DUF506) | UP (leaves) | −4.78 | −3.88 | |
AT5G37260 | RVE2 | REVEILLE 2 | DOWN (roots) | – | −1.25 |
Expression levels of genes reported to be most responsive to sulfur deprivation (Forieri et al., 2017; Supplemental Table S4) in the sesquiα2 mutant at ED and EN. Numbers indicate log2 ratios of sesquiα2 compared to the Col-0 control.