Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 3;11:21608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01116-6

Table 3.

Survival models for CD68+PD-L1+ and CD8+PD-L1+ for all patients.

n Univariate analysis MVA with CD68+PD-L1+ MVA with PD-L1+ MVA with CD8+PD-L1+
HR 95% CI p value HR 95% CI p value HR 95% CI p value HR 95% CI p value
Overall survival
Age (< 55 vs. ≥ 55) 105 vs. 138 0.48 0.29–0.80 0.004 0.46 0.26–0.78 0.004 0.40 0.23–0.67 0.001 0.45 0.22–0.93 0.031
Size (≤ 20 vs. > 20 mm) 113 vs. 129 0.54 0.32–0.89 0.016 0.53 0.31–0.92 0.024 0.54 0.32–0.93 0.026 0.54 0.29–1.04 0.066
LN status (neg vs. pos) 156 vs. 85 0.43 0.27–0.70 0.001 0.43 0.25–0.73 0.002 0.44 0.26–0.73 0.002 0.44 0.24–0.81 0.008
Chemotherapy (yes vs. no) 174 vs. 58 0.49 0.30–0.81 0.006 0.49 0.24–1.04 0.063
CD68+PD-L1+ (high vs. low) 116 vs. 115 0.59 0.36–0.96 0.034 0.56 0.33–0.95 0.030
PD-L1+ (high vs. low) 122 vs. 121 0.60 0.36–0.96 0.034 0.54 0.33–0.90 0.018
CD8+PD-L1+ (high vs. low) 104 vs. 103 0.82 0.47–1.41 0.467 1.07 0.57–1.99 0.838
Breast cancer specific survival
Age (< 55 vs. ≥ 55) 105 vs. 138 0.50 0.27–0.91 0.022 0.41 0.21–0.77 0.005 0.55 0.25–1.23 0.147
Size (≤ 20 vs. > 20 mm) 113 vs. 129 0.45 0.24–0.85 0.013 0.51 0.26–0.99 0.046 0.54 0.25–1.17 0.119
LN status (neg vs. pos) 156 vs. 85 0.31 0.17–0.55  < 0.001 0.23 0.12–0.45  < 0.001 0.30 0.16–0.56  < 0.001 0.29 0.14–0.60 0.001
Chemotherapy (yes vs. no) 174 vs. 58 0.69 0.37–1.30 0.253 0.45 0.21–0.96 0.039 0.60 0.23–1.52 0.278
CD68+PD-L1+ (high vs. low) 116 vs. 115 0.58 0.31–1.06 0.075 0.47 0.25–0.88 0.018
PD-L1+ (high vs. low) 122 vs. 121 0.60 0.33–1.09 0.093 0.50 0.27–0.92 0.026
CD8+PD-L1+ (high vs. low) 104 vs. 103 1.01 0.52–1.95 0.975 1.12 0.53–2.33 0.770

LN, lymph node; MVA, multivariate analysis. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models using a p value threshold of 0.05 for statistical significance, which are labelled in bold. Some multivariate models may not feature all significant p values, [–] indicates the immunophenotype was not significant.